On 15 February 2012 20:04, Jeremy Brown <jjbosstrac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>That is a comment that the layout needs to be
>>cleaner (a comment I agree with).
>
> I agree too. I tried to create a cleaner layout and I posted a mockup for
> all to see and voice their opinions.
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/jjbosstracker/TomcatMockup.jpg

Looks good.

There's no obvious link to the Tomcat License - this is a problem with
the existing site, but perhaps could be fixed at the same time.

> I'll leave it to Mark, Konstantin, Wesley and whomever else to let me know
> when it is reasonable to move forward.
>
> Cheers, Jeremy
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 14/02/2012 16:21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> > Mark,
>> >
>> > On 2/13/12 5:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> >> On 13/02/2012 20:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> IIRC, Pid did a bunch of work toward that end and it was
>> >>> ultimately vetoed
>> >>
>> >> Reference please. That is not my recollection at all.
>> >
>> > Markmail remembers:
>> >
>> > http://markmail.org/message/og235cbvrdluiejg
>>
>> That isn't a veto. That is a comment that the layout needs to be
>> cleaner (a comment I agree with). From a style point of view it is a
>> big improvement.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> >
>> >> My recollection was that pid started down this road but hasn't
>> >> found the time to finish it, or at least get it to a state where
>> >> enough was complete that it could be committed.
>> >
>> > Konstantin liked it for the ROOT webapp, but not the Tomcat main
>> > site. Same with Wesley Acheson.
>> >
>> > -chris
>> >
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPOpx3AAoJEBDAHFovYFnnxEIP/Rvhm+UYlVq5enUzWlPbLmWC
>> ZPXcduolPXTVwU2jpIZpSw020677h92kq3dWFL7JSlKNhuHK2C/fS0iI9YYY0Xp/
>> L9qYf7fvzSvzka7wUFJxFXLwPX6uoDAFwFtr+KSBmus3S206elkCCtILB/z06itA
>> VE31NVqOmXqLq7ZrqsE+4oxzqdkiJV1Cl1uKfR+O0LRJJ39Yl5+LyjThRDWdandC
>> JoWDnJhz/rAWC473X4NWh9q0LXK04uiufvHN3qtq1tbjl2YQ2tkEdcgJilXXCOF/
>> NgcnvBlWw5R6o9w2Hm7X5xu6YAi8FS1sdWZ5QAihMud23pxT4KCUlK7DSzz2v3Yt
>> vWXEWpbaOD7kFa2c1Wj8dxED4q9ZB8UZZfBkCpG/AGXA1W1DrygPOePkRCNMzBSe
>> L7JWBU5CBJ6avlSnEFMXZIgXg/iVf0bGJUSZr+nL9auoDmJwyN46/HyDeK9ucWyn
>> O6TTzCFgCrcI01k7sVt3vrmtX2/JcvF2O0XMGRYTD/6trFWg96eA7NeOab7Rq90S
>> S6HcEFWGgM52/SibK49yc1J1oQvwNFHzZ2FNINMLBHRI4FjnbLbwxqF8IcZtKs+5
>> YlbpiiXz+9LIUS8negOTTStXJFqmGaauYMZmIDf7JxFfxozCCQsayifzn+62STrX
>> bx3sI4uobJxVqoNNe++B
>> =F97+
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to