https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52500
--- Comment #35 from Michael <michael_fur...@hotmail.com> 2012-03-11 19:48:23 UTC --- Dear Christopher, Thank you for the patch! Any case, I will happy if you will change the X509SubjectDnRetriever class to X509DefaultSubjectDnRetriever. In this case I will be able to use the X509SubjectDnRetriever name for my class. It will help me a lot. Please do it for me :) BTW, when 7.0.27 will be released? >No 'X509UsernameRetrieverConfiguration' attribute. This can be handled with >a custom class instead of the more complicated proposed configuration. I am not sure that I agree with your suggestion :) It is not possible to create a dedicated class for all possible values. The full X509SubjectDnRetriever implementation required the additional configuration. I will ask to consider once again to add the x509UsernameRetrieverConfiguration as in the provided patch. In this case X509UsernameRetriever provided by the classname (e.g. the full X509SubjectDnRetriever implementation) will be able to use the required configuration. If you will not agree with the provided patch – I will need to change the implementation of the full X509SubjectDnRetriever implementation to read the configuration form the dedicated properties file. It is not nice to have two configurations in the same Tomcat, but I will not have other option :( I am waiting for your reply. Best regards, Michael -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
