On 07/08/12 22:46, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53601Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> --- trunk != 7.0.x/trunk hence closing this as INVALID. Maybe we need to start an 8.0.x BZ project for 8.0.x specific issues.
That is correct. I used the bugzilla web interface and discovered that it would not allow me to post against the latest trunk (aka 8.0), only against 7.0. I decided the most helpful action was to reopen the original (misdirected) 7.0 bug report.
There really should be an 8.0 option, otherwise we run the risk of further (possibly more significant) confusion in future.
I have updated the building instructions for trunk and also included a reference to OpenJDK and other JDK vendors although on this occasion I did not use the provided patch.
The new wording is fine with me. I only provided a patch in case the developers were all busy and would have preferred a "proposed default" wording.
BTW my patch was against a 8.0 trunk revision number, so that should have disambiguated it. The specific "bug" and change were obviously trivial, but the meta-topic is not. I hope this follow up does not cause offence - I'm just trying to be helpful.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
