2012/11/25 <ma...@apache.org>: > Author: markt > Date: Sat Nov 24 23:12:49 2012 > New Revision: 1413281 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1413281&view=rev > Log: > WebSocket 1.0 implementation part 1 of many. > Implement the the bootstrap code for Endpoints defined both using > POJOS+annotations and programmatically. > At this stage the ServerContainer just dumps relevant info to stdout. > Add initial an implementation of the Echo example for each of the approaches. > > Added: > tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/websocket/ > tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/websocket/ClientContainerImpl.java (with > props) > tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/websocket/ServerContainerImpl.java (with > props) > tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/websocket/Util.java (with props) > tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/websocket/WsSci.java (with props) > tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/websocket/WsServlet.java (with props) > tomcat/trunk/res/META-INF/default/ > tomcat/trunk/res/META-INF/websocket-impl.jar/ > tomcat/trunk/res/META-INF/websocket-impl.jar/services/ > > tomcat/trunk/res/META-INF/websocket-impl.jar/services/javax.servlet.ServletContainerInitializer > (with props) > tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/websocket/ > tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/websocket/TestUtil.java (with props) > > tomcat/trunk/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes/websocket/echo/EchoAnnotation.java > (with props) > > tomcat/trunk/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes/websocket/echo/EchoEndpoint.java > (with props) > > tomcat/trunk/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes/websocket/echo/WsConfigListener.java > (with props) > Modified: > tomcat/trunk/build.xml > tomcat/trunk/conf/catalina.properties > tomcat/trunk/java/javax/websocket/ContainerProvider.java > tomcat/trunk/java/javax/websocket/WebSocketEndpoint.java > tomcat/trunk/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/web.xml >
This commit introduces package "org.apache.websocket" and files "websocket-impl.jar", "websocket-impl-src.jar 1. I think it would be better to have "org.apache.tomcat.websocket.*", instead of "org.apache.websocket.*". The o.a.tomcat namespace belongs to our PMC. The chance of a conflict with other Apache projects will be smaller. 2. I think it would be better to have "tomcat-websocket-impl.jar" or simply "tomcat-websocket.jar" instead of "websocket-impl.jar" In Maven you will name it "tomcat-<foo>.jar" anyway. There will be less conflicts from including such a name into "jarsToSkip" list. Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
