On Jun 28, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 28/06/2013 17:00, Nick Williams wrote: >> >> On Jun 28, 2013, at 2:35 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote: >> >>> Author: markt Date: Fri Jun 28 07:35:49 2013 New Revision: 1497670 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1497670 Log: WebSocket 1.0, section >>> 8.2 There is an implied restriction that any initial upgrade >>> request must use HTTP GET. >>> >>> + !"GET".equals(((HttpServletRequest) >>> request).getMethod())) { // Not an HTTP request that includes a >>> valid upgrade request to // web socket + // Note: RFC >>> 2616 does not limit HTTP upgrade to GET requests but + >>> // the the Java WebSocket spec 1.0, section 8.2 implies such >>> a + // limitation >> >> Unfortunate that the Java WebSocket spec is in direct contradiction >> with the RFC spec. > > Please provide a reference for the part of RFC 6455 you believe this > change violates.
I was going off your comment, which originally suggested this was the case. However, now that you have clarified your comment, my comments are no longer applicable. Nick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
