On Jul 12, 2013, at 1:46 AM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245 > > --- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> --- > It is worth noting that this new test case fails and that this is expected as > it highlights at least one bug (bug 55250) in the refactored JspC code. > > I've added this locally but will refrain from committing it until the tests > pass. > > As an aside, what is wrong with the JSPO syntax in the test for 47331?
47331 is about Tomcat not returning an error if a JSP illegally has deferred syntax embedded. The test JSP deliberately has such a syntax error and the test case looks for a 500 response from the server. JspC also detects that error and aborts the compilation run. One option would be to move that type of negative test into a different webapp. Perhaps better long term would be to have JspC continue whilst accumulating errors so we can test both types of outcome at the end. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
