On 16/07/2013 09:02, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> 2013/7/15 <[email protected]>
<snip/>
>> +public class AstLambdaExpressionOrInvocation extends SimpleNode {
>> +
>> + public AstLambdaExpressionOrInvocation(int id) {
>> + super(id);
>> + }
>> +
>> +
>> + @Override
>> + public Object getValue(EvaluationContext ctx) throws ELException {
>> +
>> + if (children.length == 2) {
>
> Why you are limiting the children to 2.
I was working on the basis that one LambdaExpression should have one set
of method parameters.
> We have MethodArguments -> zero or more:
That is what the specification indicates and where I would have got the
choice of '*' rather than '? 'from but as I think about it I wonder if
that is right. It doesn't look right. My instinct is that it should be '?'.
Note that the use of * might be an artefact of how they decided to
implement the spec. Note also that the grammar is not definitive - it is
only meant to be a guide.
Do you have an example of a valid expression that needs multiple method
arguments? I'll try and come up with one. If I can't I'll change the
grammar and re-generate.
Mark
> void LambdaExpressionOrCall() #LambdaExpression : {}
> {
> <LPAREN>
> LambdaParameters() <ARROW>
> (LOOKAHEAD(3) LambdaExpression() | Choice() )
> <RPAREN>
> (MethodArguments())*
> }
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
