On 24/09/2013 16:19, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 24/09/2013 08:16, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 23/09/2013 00:54, Rainer Jung wrote: >> >>> I agree that there's probably another problem further up the stack. >> >> I'm looking at this now. > > I've found a couple of issues. Not sure if either of these are the root > cause of the remaining issues we see but I'll look into fixing them. > > - AprEndpoint.destroySocket() calls Poller.removeFromPoller() but that > call isn't thread safe. I think we need a remove process similar to > the add process. > - sockets are not always removed from the timeout list when they are > destroyed
Fixed. Rainer, over to you. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
