Per the below, I'll go ahead and move RDC to the Attic; waiting 72 hours in case there's a -1.
Hen On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > My main concern is it makes inactive codebases seem alive. ie) extended > > > looks as though there's been code change in the last 5 years instead of > > > only having had code in it in 2009. Similar with RDC. > > > > > > > > On this topic, I've pinged Rahul offline to get his thoughts on retiring > > RDC to the Attic. I'm assuming he's not tracking the dev list. > > > <snip/> > > I'm here, but no dev cycles for RDC at the moment or in the near > future. So, attic sounds right. > > -Rahul > >
