https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57478

--- Comment #2 from Yu Lin <yu.lin...@gmail.com> ---
Thanks for the reply.
> Bugzilla is not a discussion for design descisions. This belongs on the dev
> list.
> 
I think this is a performance issue, so I posted it here. Or should I send it
to dev@tomcat.apache.org

> For the record, I think the kind of change you are suggesting is wrong and
> is based on a superficial understanding of the code.
Could you elaborate a bit? Don't you think invoking "Future.get()" immediately
after starting the task has the same effect as sequential execution? Is there
any better suggestions?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to