On 19/02/2015 18:27, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 19/02/2015 15:17, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> Mark
>>
>> I am seing regular failures in TestPojoEndpointBase in trunk where
>> the socket is not being closed (see attached log). I’ve not dug in
>> yet but this has started since r1660358 and may be related to recent
>> NIO changes (maybe r1660582?).
> 
> I'm fairly sure I have a fix for that wrapped up in my current changes.
> I'll get those committed as soon as I can but I am still working through
> intermittent unit test failures.
> 
> To add to the 'fun' my email provider has decided the most helpful thing
> they could do is add a random 20 min to 12+ hour delay to all my e-mail.
> That is causing its own problems - not least of which is me not seeing
> dev@ e-mails in a timely manner. Unsurprisingly DynDNS will be losing a
> customer just as quickly as I can find an alternative to migrate to.

Goodbye to the incompetence of DynDNS / DuoCircle.

Hello to DNSExit/GhettoSMTP and a system that works (and costs 50% to
75% less).

Having exchanged emails and instant messages with representatives of
both companies I already have a much warmer feeling about them than I
did with DynDNS and DuoCircle. Obviously time will tell in terms of
service but so far so good.

Now I have e-mail arriving with seconds of it being sent, back to what
I'd much rather be doing...

I think I have a fix for this that I have just committed. The unit tests
pass consistently (so far) on OSX. Now I am back at home, I'll run them
on Windows and Linux as well as BuildBot and Gump.

There are still some strange failures on Gump that I don't understand at
all. Any help investigating those would be much appreciated.

Mark


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to