On 28/02/2015 22:04, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> Resurrecting this old thread[1] as the topic came up related to the site 
> changes. First message included for context below.
> 
> TL;DR: Konstantin and I had interest in new work on Standard, Henri has 
> helped with logistics. No-one had any interest in RDC. A concern at the time 
> was lack of progress toward a release but since then we released 1.2.1 in 
> 2014/01 and recently 1.2.3. The 1.2 version has been picked up by some 
> downstream projects; to my knowledge, it is the only implementation available 
> under an Apache-style license.
> 
> Rather than retire Taglibs now I would propose we attempt to reignite 
> community interest which will require steps beyond simply maintaining 1.2.x. 
> I’d propose the following:
> 
> - Retire RDC to the Attic
> - Put Standard 1.2.x in maintenance mode for bug fixes only
> - Fix the sub-site so it’s easier to maintain
> - Start a tree/branch for new work without the limitations of the now-ancient 
> 1.2 spec
> - Plan to release new work early & often
> 
> Thoughts?

Go for it.

Mark


> Jeremy
> 
> [1] 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-dev/201210.mbox/%3C50694B65.9040904%40apache.org%3E
> 
>> On Oct 1, 2012, at 12:51 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> In the two+ years since Taglibs moved to the Tomcat project there have
>> been a few short bursts of activity totalling just over 200 commits but
>> no releases. There has also been no progress towards a migration to
>> svnpubsub for the taglibs part of the web site.
>>
>> Given the lack of progress I would propose that Taglibs is moved to our
>> archive. This would mean:
>>
>> - removing the Taglibs link from tomcat.a.o
>> - removing the Taglibs web pages
>> - moving the tomcat/tagslibs svn tree to tomcat/archive/taglibs
>> - making the Taglibs BZ project read-only
>> - moving the Taglibs committers to emeritus status
>> - removing the Taglibs from Gump
>>
>> There is nothing to remove from dist.a.o since there have been no releases
>>
>> Note: This is intended as a discussion topic - not a formal proposal/vote.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to