On 26/05/2015 13:23, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2015-05-26 13:39 GMT+03:00 Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>: >> Apart from the one failed test (BIO TestWebSocketFrameClient) CI logs all >> tests as having skipped tests, because the test run output does not contain >> "Skipped: 0" (checked in our build.xml). >> >> Locally executed tests print: >> >> [junit] Tests run: 23, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: >> 0.615 sec >> >> on the CI system: >> >> [junit] Tests run: 23, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.095 sec >> >> Is that a version inconsistency? Both should run with our configured junit >> 4.11, but maybe the CI system has another junit in the CLASSPATH? > > It is odd. > > Looking at logs there. The oldest logs have "Skipped" in them. > http://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat8/logs/ > > By dichotomy: > http://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat8/logs/1667637/ > - Good (19-Mar-2015 01:45) > http://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat8/logs/1667747/ > - Bad (19-Mar-2015 14:27) > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1667747 > is "Trivial Javadoc fix (mainly to test CI system)" > > The oldest build available at the server is > http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-8-trunk/builds/172 > (Mon Mar 23 08:33:14 2015) > > From mail archive: > [http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-dev/201503.mbox/%3C550AA0CB.80009%40apache.org%3E] > "Buildbot slave changes" > > [quote, Mark wrote] > I have just moved trunk, tomcat-8 and tomcat-6 (tomcat-7 was there > already) buildbot builds to a new slave. There main aim is to get faster > builds. A combination of a physical machine rather than an overstretched > VM and not being on the same slave as the resource intensive sling > builds should result is a significant speed up. > > I imagine I broke a bunch of stuff with the move. Apologies in advance > and I'll get it fixed as quickly as I can. > > At the same time I fixed the issues that meant the tomcat-7 builds > weren't building the Windows installer and weren't running RAT. > [/quote] > > > Tomcat trunk, Tomcat 7 builders have the same problem. > > (Trunk uses a different version of Cobertura, I have not backported r1663472. > I mean that the local build likely has not enabled Cobertura. > So it is not it.) > > Maybe the version of Apache Ant? > E.g. Ant having junit jars in its lib directory? > > Or just an old version of Ant?
I think this is: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43969 silvanus.a.o is running Ant 1.8.2. I'll get it updated to 1.9.3 and see where we are. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
