i'm ok moving it elsewhere but ok to remove it too it sounds useful but nobody is here to maintain it so i think we have to choose
*Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/1/15 Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]> > I think the restructure as David suggests sounds good. I quite like the > idea of moving the presentations to the website instead. > > I agree that keeping the Maven plugin with the rest of the build makes > sense. > > KarafEE - are you thinking of splitting it out into its own build or losing > it altogether? I haven't used it but it sounds like its useful. > > Jon > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > i'd move presentations at same level as trunk is. > > > > other wise it sounds fine > > > > another point is current trunk: do we keep it as this? > > > > personally i wonder if we should keep karafee or not > > > > we spoke about mvn plugin, tomee and openejb but currently lifecycles are > > too linked to be split IMO > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > 2013/1/14 David Blevins <[email protected]> > > > > > With the SVN changes regarding openejb->tomee renaming, I wondered if > we > > > wanted to take the opportunity to move to a more standard SVN layout. > > > > > > Right now we have a "trunk" module with a ton of things in it: > > > > > > $ svn list http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/trunk/ > > > .gitignore > > > STATUS.txt > > > camel/ > > > colossus/ > > > graduation-resolution.txt > > > javaee-api/ > > > openejb/ > > > openejb-eclipse/ > > > openejb-eclipse-plugin/ > > > patched-libraries/ > > > presentations/ > > > sandbox/ > > > > > > Having "sandbox" and "presentations" things like that under trunk is > very > > > odd. We've sort of lived with it and it's not a big deal, but we > > > developers know the actual trunk is the "openejb" module. > > > > > > Do we want to start moving to a more standard layout? Something like: > > > > > > > > > For TomEE/OpenEJB (i.e. what is currently at asf/tomee/trunk/openejb/): > > > > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/trunk/ > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/ > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/branches/ > > > > > > For javaee-api: > > > > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/javaee-api/trunk/ > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/javaee-api/tags/ > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/javaee-api/branches/ > > > > > > For Website (this already exists, just showing to see the consistency): > > > > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/site/trunk/ > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/site/branches/ > > > > > > Eclipse plugins: > > > > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/openejb-eclipse-plugin/trunk/ > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/openejb-eclipse-plugin/tags/ > > > - > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/openejb-eclipse-plugin/branches/ > > > > > > > > > Everything that doesn't fit could likely go into sandbox possibly (no > > > "trunk"): > > > > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/sandbox/ > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/sandbox/camel > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/sandbox/colossus > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/sandbox/release-tools > > > - ... > > > > > > The 'presentations' folder could probably just get moved into the site: > > > > > > - > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/site/trunk/content/presentations/ > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > >
