Hi guys,

what's the plan?

1) we fix it (the fix is easy but need to be done on tomcat itself) - easy
to do but not from our own code
2) we wait for 7.0.36 (next month i think)
3) we go back on 7.0.34

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jess Holle <[email protected]>
Date: 2013/1/18
Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.35
To: Tomcat Developers List <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Thomas <[email protected]>


On 1/18/2013 3:13 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:

> On 18/01/2013 19:32, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Mark Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Votes were as follows:
>>>
>>> +1 (binding): kkolinko, rjung, yoavs, olamy, markt
>>>
>>> No other votes were cast.
>>>
>>> The vote therefore passes.
>>>
>>> I'll publish the binaries and announce later today once the mirrors have
>>> caught up.
>>>
>> Given the regression with issue 54440, should this be withdrawn and a
>> quick release of '36 be done?
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/**bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54440<https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54440>
>>
> I'm wasn't planning on it. If that bug is a showstopper then folks can
> stick on 7.0.34 for a few more weeks.
>
Nothing in 7.0.35 is really that critical.  For myself I went to 7.0.35,
swore furiously about the bug -- almost just dropped back to 7.0.34 but
then applied the patch and moved on.

I guess the real question is how many "new to Tomcat" folk are
realistically going to pick up 7.0.35 *and* jump to doing JSP
precompilation *and* do so before 7.0.36 is out.  If they're /not /new to
Tomcat, then they know it *did* work and will start looking for where it
stopped, check the mailing lists, etc.  If not and they hit this issue
before 7.0.36 is announced, then they'll just assume Tomcat is no good --
but how many folk will really fall into that category?

--
Jess Holle

Reply via email to