but just to be clear: IRC is a really good way to quickly get feedback. But all the important decision making process and communication needs to be on the ASF mailing lists. There is an old saying over here: "if it didn't happen on the mailing list, it didn't happen" :)
The reason is that IRC is not logged (because of a few good legal reasons) and the information is only available to a very few people who were logged in to the IRC. LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: dsh <daniel.hais...@gmail.com> > To: dev@tomee.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 7:05 AM > Subject: Re: IGood validation candidates: SubTask 39, 48 > > Hi Ralf, > > we are as well on freenode (IRC #openejb) just in case you prefer IRC over > email... > > Cheers > Daniel > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:37 PM, <ralf.battenf...@bluewin.ch> wrote: > >> Hi Daniel >> >> Thank you. Yes indeed, I meant David:-) Very kind that you replied. >> >> I can see many test cases for other validations tasks. These are good >> starting points for me. Subtaks 48 is the one, I am considering to work on, >> after I understood the internals. I will ask you experts as soon as they >> arise. >> >> Tx, Ralf >> >> >> >> >> On 20.03.13 20:32 dsh wrote: >> >> Hi Ralf, >> >> >> thought I am going to answer this question, knowing that you probably meant >> David instead of Daniel ;) >> >> >> I'd say if you like take both if they are available. That's really > up to >> your personal working style and how you like to sort out things. Don't >> forget to ask questions as soon as they arise! >> >> >> Cheers >> Daniel >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:02 PM, ralf.battenf...@bluewin.ch < >> ralf.battenf...@bluewin.ch> wrote: >> >> >> > Hi Daniel >> > >> > Going though the list, I see the following validations as ideal >> candidates >> > for me:-) >> > 39: Validation: >> > @ConcurrencyManagement mistakenly used on non-Singleton >> > 48: Validation: Field annotated with more than one injection; >> > @EJB, @Resource, @PersistenceContext, @PersistenceUnit >> > >> > Shall I take one or both two and dig into the details? >> > >> > Ralf >> > >> > >> > >> > ----Ursprüngliche Nachricht---- >> > Von: ralf.battenf...@bluewin.ch >> > Datum: 20.03.2013 02:42 >> > An: <ralf.battenf...@bluewin.ch>, <ralf. >> > ralf.battenf...@bluewin.ch> >> > Betreff: Re: Hello all together >> > >> > Hello, Ralf! >> > >> > Welcome aboard. We love having new people, >> > especially ones that love OpenEJB :) >> > >> > Starting small is definitely the right approach. On project this large >> > that can >> > still be pretty big, but hopefully we can find you something that > fits. >> > One area I think is always a good place for >> > new help is the validation code: >> > >> > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-453 >> > >> > There's always something to do there. Most of that code lives >> > here: >> > >> > - >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-453 >> > >> > - >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-453 >> > >> > >> > That's probably not enough information to completely get started, > but >> > hopefully we can inch our way there. Do any of >> > those validations look interesting to you? >> > >> > >> > -David >> > >> > >> > On Mar 17, 2013, at 6:28 AM, ralf.battenf...@bluewin.ch wrote: >> > >> > > >> > Hi >> > > >> > > I recently subscribed myself to the dev list. I would love to > help and >> > contribute, especially for the OpenEJB >> > part. >> > > I work as a Java EE developer mainly on the backend side:-) >> > > I am also contributing from time to time to the >> > Shrinkwrap >> > > Descriptor project. >> > > >> > > I was looking at the OpenEJB JIRAs, probably the subtask JIRAs > maybe >> > candidates? >> > As you wrote for >> > > beginners, start small:-) If you have something to do, let me > know. >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Ralf >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >
