@Romain: I'll try to raise an INFRA JIRA this evening. I don't think that I do have access to the build server any more and AFAIK there's only an IBM JDK v6 installed on the build server.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>wrote: > @Daniel: if anyone has some time that's a good idea > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > 2013/4/4 dsh <[email protected]> > > > @All: I wonder whether we could reactivate our IBM JDK build. Maybe this > > issue would have been catched by our test cases too. > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > Thanks Eric for this feedback :), think it will help some more people > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/4/4 dsh <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > > > > > so now everything works okay or are you still experiencing any issues > > > while > > > > running TomEE on an IBM JDK? > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:39 PM, ehenson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > That was indeed the fix to this issue! > > > > > > > > > > So to be able to serve SOAP CFX Services using IBM J9, in which > case > > > I'm > > > > > running it on an IBM i (aka AS/400 or iSeries), I then added the > next > > > > four > > > > > line to the conf/system.properties file: > > > > > > > > > > javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory = > > > > > > > > > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl > > > > > javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory = > > > > > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl > > > > > javax.xml.soap.SOAPConnectionFactory = > > > > > > > > > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnectionFactory > > > > > javax.xml.soap.MetaFactory = > > > > > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.SAAJMetaFactoryImpl > > > > > > > > > > This actually fixes several issues. For the sake of email search > > > engines > > > > > I'll will note them here. > > > > > > > > > > My original issue started when I received this exception: > > > > > java.lang.VerifyError: JVMVRFY012 stack shape inconsistent; > > > > > class=com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/soap/SOAPDocumentImpl, > > > > > method=createDocumentFragment()Lorg/w3c/dom/DocumentFragment;, pc=5 > > > > > > > > > > I called IBM and they told me to add the next entry to the > > > > > /QIBM/UserData/Java400/SystemDefault.properties file to tell the > JVM > > to > > > > not > > > > > to verify the classes: > > > > > > > > > > #AllowOptions > > > > > -Xverify:none > > > > > > > > > > Then I started to receive this exception: > > > > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > > > > > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.ElementNSImpl > > > > > > > > > > Once I added the four lines to TomEE's conf/system.properties file > > > > > everything works perfect and I do not have to use the -Xverify:none > > > > option. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4661992.html > > > > > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
