Renaming has side effects and sell not go for openejb-tomcat renaming. Maybe just ask NB to fix it, no? Le 21 oct. 2013 20:46, "Kay Wrobel" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Um? What do you mean? > > On 10/21/2013 01:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Openejb-tomcat-=tomee- now >> >> Netbeans should just upgrade imo. >> Le 21 oct. 2013 20:32, "Kay Wrobel" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> Hi everybody. >>> >>> I am the maintainer of the NetBeans CRUD Generator module and question >>> I've been asked a few times now is whether it works with Tomcat. I always >>> refer the user to TomEE because of its EJB support that's required. One >>> problem, though, is that NetBeans does not recognize TomEE as a valid >>> Java >>> EE 6 application server. And so, generating JSF pages from Entity Classes >>> as well as my module for generating PrimeFaces pages from Entity Classes >>> fails because the GUI won't let you continue. >>> >>> I've stuck my head into the NetBeans source code to find out exactly how >>> they make that determination and found that they are looping through the >>> project's classpath. And if they find a file that begins with >>> "openejb-tomcat", the user can continue with the GUI to generate those >>> pages. The standard TomEE distribution does contain a whole bunch of JARs >>> that begin with "openejb-*", none of the actually are called >>> openejb-tomcat. So I tested simply renaming a the >>> "openejb-http-4.5.2.jar" >>> to "openejb-tomcat-4.5.2.jar", and lo and behold, NetBeans thinks TomEE >>> is >>> a Java EE 6 server. >>> >>> First off, I don't know if I renamed to right file, but TomEE itself >>> seems >>> to start and operate just fine with the renamed file. Next, I was >>> wondering >>> if, for future releases, you could pick one of the openejb- files and >>> name >>> it openejb-tomcat-*.jar so that NetBeans detection works properly? I know >>> it's more of a NetBeans issue rather than TomEE/OpenEJB issue, but that >>> is >>> a HUGE project and getting things rolling in that project is slow to say >>> the least. I have a feeling, a simple change in file name would not be >>> too >>> hard for you guys to accomplish for future releases? >>> >>> Thanks for any thoughts on this topic. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Kay Wrobel >>> >>> >
