@Andy: basically you are right but the point is today the same guys are working on these projects so splitting them will create more work (it is already hard enough to get a release, we had been forked so much time because of it in companies) Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/10/29 Andy <[email protected]>: > I'm happy to get versions aligned with each other, especially for maven > simplification. I'd prefer to keep our own logical version though, so I'd > opt for 2.0. > > However, I would probably rock the boat with suggesting OpenEJB and TomEE > could be separated into their own trunks/versions? > > I use OpenEJB in embedded and in standalone (Although I will eventually move > to TomEE in standalone). > > TomEE sits on OpenEJB, as TomEE sits on Tomcat. I think this should remain > an obvious separation as they should really be interchangeable to some > degree. Imagine the development benefits of easily swapping out the > following stable versions for snapshots ;-). > > OpenEJB 2.0 - TomEE 2.0 - Tomcat 7.0.42 > > Andy. >
