Not ideal, but at this point I'm willing to try anything at least once. I'm more curious to see if it works than anything.
-David On Nov 7, 2013, at 11:09 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > Mens well have 2 trunks with same code...im not in love > Le 8 nov. 2013 08:02, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Heads up, making the branch for 1.6.0. >> >> As sort of a crazy idea, I thought it might be interesting to branch for >> 1.6.1 now as well. Our intention would be to get this out *immediately* >> after 1.6.0 and I think it might help confidence that this will actually >> occur if we effectively start that release process now. >> >> We always say we're going to release immediately after, but we never do, >> so seems like it's worth a shot. >> >> If you think it's a horrible idea and you're willing to sign up to ensure >> 1.6.1 comes out right after 1.6.0, I'll happily delete -- win-win for me :) >> >> >> -David >> >>
