Hello All. Comming from Glassfish backgound I also find OpenEJB -TomEE versioning confusing. So making the vesions equal sound good to me. Mergin version numbers with Java EE is probably not necessary as no other Java AS doest this I think.
I would even rename it, like TomEE-OpenEjB or something.:) As most uses migrating fom Jboss and especially now GF will maybe get a litlle confused. Or maybe I don't understand it clearly. Romain +1 BR MAtej 2013/11/25 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > Not sure David, this would at least allow us to use mvn release plugin and > avoid current state where trunk is the snapqhot of the already released > version. It would also allow an easier code mintainance regarding version > (we use it in several places, pom and java). > Le 24 nov. 2013 23:23, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > More a note to Romain as I've not seen anyone else propose changing the > > version number to match OpenEJB. To be honest, I'm not sure what this > > would give us. > > > > It wouldn't make releases any easier or harder. > > > > > > -David > > > > On Nov 24, 2013, at 1:16 PM, Bjorn Danielsson < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Ideally TomEE would have a version number that tracks both > > > the Java EE version and the Tomcat version, while it is also > > > matching the OpenEJB version. But satisfying all of this is > > > obviously impossible, so why not just bump the TomEE version > > > to match the OpenEJB version at the next opportunity? > > > > > > -- > > > Bjorn Danielsson > > > Cuspy Code AB > > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Hi > > >> > > >> we are still in x.6.0-SNAPSHOT on trunk > > >> > > >> what do we decide for "+1" version? x.6.1-SNAPSHOT or 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT > > >> or 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT or sthg else? > > >> > > >> first is the "logical" one but means we still target JavaEE6, > > >> 2.0.0 is good for tomee but as said in another thread I'd like to > > >> align openejb and tomee > > >> 5.0.0 comes from this last point > > >> > > >> I propose to keep this thread up a bit if there is discussion and then > > >> maybe throw a vote. > > >> > > >> wdyt? > > >> > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> Twitter: @rmannibucau > > >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > >
