The 2nd vote failed too :( Le 13 déc. 2013 21:37, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Yes, I know that. > That's is really something I'd like to do. > > I was waiting for the latest Tomcat release, but the first shoot failed so > the now VOTE is ongoing. > If ok, we can maybe start the process before Xmas. > > Just waiting for a bit more feedback on the shaded stuff (quartz). > Let's say, we can wait more one week and they, let's try to produce > something before the end of the year. > > JLouis > > > > 2013/12/13 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > > Just by curiosity: will we get a Xmas release? (i m not directly concern > by > > any issues but i know some guys the cxf fix is really important for) > > Le 8 déc. 2013 23:11, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit > : > > > > > I suspect we'd be wise to see how the quartz change weathers in the > > > snapshots for a while before releasing it. > > > > > > -David > > > > > > On Dec 6, 2013, at 5:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > since we use a shade of quartz (some real life validation would be > > > > great) shouldn't we set 1.7.0? > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > Twitter: @rmannibucau > > > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > > > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/12/6 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: > > > >> Small update: finally got an answer on Tomcat mailling list. Tomcat > > > 7.0.48 > > > >> should be opened next week. > > > >> > > > >> Jean-Louis > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> 2013/11/25 AndyG <[email protected]> > > > >> > > > >>> +1 Works for me > > > >>> > > > >>> Andy. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> View this message in context: > > > >>> > > > > > > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Preparing-1-6-1-maintenance-release-tp4666324p4666384.html > > > >>> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Jean-Louis > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Jean-Louis >
