and to JL to drive it so hard ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2014-04-07 22:44 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>:
> Forgot a big big thank you to Romain as usual. He's always so active and
> efficient that we sometimes forget to highlight his high valuable
> contribution.
>
> Thanks Romain.
>
>
> 2014-04-07 21:50 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> As discussed heavily, the security maintenance release to fix the Tomcat
>> CVE 2014-50.
>> According to our discussions and decisions summarized here
>> https://tomee.apache.org/security/index.html
>> we will start the release process.
>>
>> Special thanks to Jon who has worked heavily to prepare everything and
>> ensure the TCK all passes.
>>
>> Another big thanks to Andy who proposed to be the release manager.
>>
>> That's what I call a community.
>>
>> Jean-Louis
>>
>>
>> See the end of the message for more details on the CVE.
>>
>> *Important: Denial of Service* 
>> CVE-2014-0050<http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-0050>
>>
>> It was possible to craft a malformed Content-Type header for a multipart
>> request that caused Apache Tomcat to enter an infinite loop. A malicious
>> user could, therefore, craft a malformed request that triggered a denial of
>> service.
>>
>> The root cause of this error was a bug in Apache Commons FileUpload.
>> Tomcat 7 uses a packaged renamed copy of Apache Commons FileUpload to
>> implement the requirement of the Servlet 3.0 specification to support the
>> processing of mime-multipart requests. Tomcat 7 was therefore affected by
>> this issue.
>>
>> This was fixed in revision 
>> 1565169<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1565169>
>> .
>>
>> This issue was reported to the Apache Software Foundation on 04 Feb 2014
>> and accidently made public on 06 Feb 2014.
>>
>> Affects: 7.0.0-7.0.50
>> --
>> Jean-Louis
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis

Reply via email to