Since it's transparent for the users, we should use always try to keep up
to date.
No Maven 2 please. :) The version 2 already haunt me enough in my day time
job.

[]s,
Thiago.


On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<[email protected]>wrote:

> well not sure we are really affected but update should be hurtless.
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-04-28 11:36 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]>:
> > AFAIR, it's ok as soon as Maven 3 is used.
> > Can't remember with Maven 2.
> >
> > Well, we could probably do that, but it's more a matter of the user
> taking
> > care of its computer security.
> > I'm ok to reinforce the level, as soon as it does not prevent
> contributors
> > to contribute the project.
> >
> > Jean-Louis
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:50 AM, helio frota <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> I think 3.0.5 should by now be the entry level version, especially due
> to
> >> this - http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-0253
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> And thanks for share this.
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------
> >> http://eprogramming.github.io
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Andy Gumbrecht <
> [email protected]
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > While checking out several of the powerful features of the -
> >> > http://mojo.codehaus.org/versions-maven-plugin/ - it was apparent
> that
> >> > some of the actions require a minimum Maven version in order to be
> >> > effective.
> >> >
> >> > Therfore I am thinking of adding the following to parent poms:
> >> >
> >> >   <prerequisites>
> >> >     <maven>3.?</maven>
> >> >   </prerequisites>
> >> >
> >> > The question is, which Maven version? I am actually using the latest
> >> 3.2.1
> >> > without issues.
> >> >
> >> > What is your:  mvn --version
> >> >
> >> > I think 3.0.5 should by now be the entry level version, especially
> due to
> >> > this - http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-0253
> >> >
> >> > What do you all think?
> >> >
> >> > Andy.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >   Andy Gumbrecht
> >> >
> >> >   http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >   [email protected]
> >> >   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >> >
> >> >   TomEE treibt Tomitribe! | http://tomee.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>

Reply via email to