OK, I have now tested my webapp with trunk from this morning.
All my filters and servlets and JAX-RS stuff and request-
forwarding worked as expected, except that I had to change
my @Path-annotated POJO into an @ApplicationPath-annotated
subclass of javax.ws.rs.core.Application, otherwise a special
legacy servlet (a third-party WebDAV servlet) couldn't be invoked.
I realized that this was a bug on my part, and after making the
change all is good.

-- 
Bjorn Danielsson
Cuspy Code AB


Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote:
> if you have foo.jsp in the webapp root and foo.jsp contains any
> sensitive information (password but also just some algorithm used for
> security or headers...) then the raw jsp will be exposed to the client
> (not interpreted)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-09-18 21:25 GMT+02:00 Bjorn Danielsson 
> <[email protected]>:
>> Romain, could you please remind me what this security issue is?
>>
>> I am mixing jaxrs POJOs with servlet filters doing authorization,
>> and doing forwards to jsp and other resources in the middle of
>> everything, so I'll be happy to test this (on trunk I assume).
>>
>> --
>> Bjorn Danielsson
>> Cuspy Code AB
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi guys
>>>
>>> anyone with time to review my last days hacking to fix our jaxrs
>>> issue? idea is to replace jaxrs servlet by a filter coming at the end
>>> of the chain (to still be able to do security etc ;)). This way if the
>>> resource exists we just delegate to the servlet handling it (jsp...).
>>>
>>> What needs to be done: review what I did didn't introduce a regression
>>> I could have missed
>>>
>>> open point: in org.apache.tomee.webservices.CXFJAXRSFilter#doFilter we
>>> can desire add few "rule" to say "that's a resource urls (thought to
>>> suffix like .css, .js...)" and in this case forget about JAXRS. That
>>> said not sure it would be used that much so I didn't want to add it
>>> *now*.
>>>
>>> Once sby validated it is ok then I'll backport it on 1.7 branch
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau

Reply via email to