well here the issue is on your side I already increased it to 512 but we should be able to run it with 64. A task to do before hacking on tcks. That's the game ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-10-17 20:59 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > did you have your JAVA_OPTS properly tuned? > > I use the following in /etc/mavenrc: > export MAVEN_OPTS="-Xms128m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=196m -client" > > Works fine for most projects. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > >> On Friday, 17 October 2014, 8:26, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi >> >> that's the case 'ie not your laptop issue) >> >> first step in tck work is to get rid of it. I didnt dig into it but it >> is likely an issue with a memory leak with arquillian openejb embedded >> or openejb-http embedded layer, maybe due to LocalBeanProxy - not >> sure. >> >> To reduce the set of test you can use the testng xml file but I don't >> like the idea to reduce the default set since it would just hide a >> real issue. >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> 2014-10-17 2:03 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha <[email protected]>: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> Maybe I don't have a good laptop, but TCK for cdi-embedded don't >> run here. >>> :( >>> I have a "GC overhead limit exceeded" when I run the TCK tests in >> my work, >>> I don't have problem, but at home always show this msg. >>> >>> Can I reduce some TCK tests? How do I do it? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net> >>> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br >>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ >>> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro >>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha >>
