> > 1) do we keep org.apache.openejb as groupid or do we finally go to > org.apache.tomee? >
org.apache.tomee > 2) do we create a dependency module (as assembly) with N children providing > pre-built pom for jaxrs embedded, tomee embedded jaxrs, plume > etc....Advantage would be to get rid of our internal dependencies as main > dependencies for users (I think to openejb-core for instance) + it would > make it easier to start for users when needing some advanced setup (tomee > embedded "plus" for instance). > Overall idea is fine, but I had a pretty bad experience with bom and all this crap previously. Usually it's worst than dealing with the real deps. So +0 for me -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > while voting on the version i'd like to propose to discuss 2 more topics: > > 1) do we keep org.apache.openejb as groupid or do we finally go to > org.apache.tomee? > 2) do we create a dependency module (as assembly) with N children providing > pre-built pom for jaxrs embedded, tomee embedded jaxrs, plume > etc....Advantage would be to get rid of our internal dependencies as main > dependencies for users (I think to openejb-core for instance) + it would > make it easier to start for users when needing some advanced setup (tomee > embedded "plus" for instance). > > wdyt? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> >
