> 
> will change it and add a flag to go back to previous behavior if desired

Side note on that: sometimes it makes sense to create switches to switch back 
to custom behaviour. But our code becomes increasingly hard to maintain that 
way.

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 15.06.2015 um 20:26 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> The trick is we need to rely on shutdown() being called when the bean is
>>> undeployed to ensure the application can successfully terminate and not
>>> leak timers.
>>> 
>> 
> 
> we can use ScheduledTask#cancel then
> 
> will change it and add a flag to go back to previous behavior if desired
> 
> 
>>> Sharing a ScheduledExecutorService per application is the best we could
>> do
>>> in that regard.  The shutdown logic would still become a bit difficult as
>>> would the Stateless container logic. The StatelessInstanceManager which
>>> builds the pool would also have to build the ScheduledExecutorService and
>>> pass it in, track the ScheduledExecutorService in the ApplicationContext
>> or
>>> ModuleContext and clean it up on undeploy.  The StatelessInstanceManager
>>> would have to be careful not to create the ScheduledExecutorService more
>>> than once per app or destroy it more than once per app.
>>> 
>>> The pool class would need to remain generic (not specific to stateless
>>> beans) and still be prepared to construct a ScheduledExecutorService if
>> one
>>> wasn't passed in.  Similar to what it does now for the regular Executor
>>> service.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -David
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> [email protected]
>>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>> 
>>>> already got this issue and Mark pinged me about it yesterday. ATM we
>> have
>>>> 1
>>>> eviction thread by stateless instance manager (pool). So if you have 100
>>>> stateless beans you then have 100 threads doing nothing.
>>>> 
>>>> Do we want to reduce it to N fixed threads (default to 3 maybe?) per
>>>> stateless container (but multiple tasks to keep access timeout and close
>>>> timeout respected)?
>>>> 
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to