Ok so we have Jean-Louis and Romain that we can say they are neutral, Mark for alpine and Andy for Debian. For me Alpine is the best one in terms of performance but we are tight to apk which is far always from being as good as debian apt get El dt., 23 de juny, 2015 a les 21.25 Andy Gumbrecht < agumbre...@tomitribe.com> va escriure:
> Jumping in late. This image will be used as a foundation for others to > extend with many different features. Therefore I think the image should > provide as much flexibility as possible > > Thanks for all your work Alex. > > Andy. > > http://www.tomitribe.com - @AndyGeeDe - On a small screen device. > On 23 Jun 2015 17:26, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > > > almost nothing. > > 2 Dockerfiles and a bit of storage ;) > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > Am 23.06.2015 um 17:48 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > >: > > > > > > what's the cost of havingboth BTW? > > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > > > > > 2015-06-23 17:46 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > > > > > >> I really like Alpine. Gives you apk as well but is really down to the > > core > > >> without any useless ballast. > > >> > > >> LieGrue, > > >> strub > > >> > > >> > > >>> Am 23.06.2015 um 17:40 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > >>> : > > >>> > > >>> debian is more known IMO but not sure it changes much things for > final > > >>> users, what's your opinion Alex? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > >>> > > >>> 2015-06-23 17:31 GMT+02:00 Alex Soto <asot...@gmail.com>: > > >>> > > >>>> Guys what do you prefer for official Docker image. Be light with > > Alpine > > >> or > > >>>> be versatile with Debian? > > >>>> > > >>>> El dl., 22 juny 2015 a les 23:59, Alex Soto (<asot...@gmail.com>) > va > > >>>> escriure: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Thanks well I am still not 100% happy, what I am wondering is if > > debian > > >>>>> image or alpine image. I m hesitant about this :) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> El dl., 22 juny 2015 a les 23:23, Jean-Louis Monteiro (< > > >>>>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>) va escriure: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> This is awesome Alex. > > >>>>>> Thanks for driving this from start to end. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Really great contribution. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro > > >>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > >>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Alex Soto <asot...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Hi mates I have been working on creating a TomEE image in Docker. > > >>>>>>> I am closely to be able to release an Apache TomEE official > > >> repository > > >>>>>> on > > >>>>>>> docker hub, but I prefer you take a look first. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> First of all I have decided to change from official openjdk image > > >>>> which > > >>>>>> is > > >>>>>>> based on debian, to official Alpine image. This change is pretty > > >>>> simple, > > >>>>>>> the Alpine docker image is a light docker image (only 5MB) and > > >>>> following > > >>>>>>> the philosophy of TomEE of light yet powerful distribution, I > think > > >>>>>> this is > > >>>>>>> a really good movement in these terms. Now the TomEE Docker image > > is > > >>>>>> 200MB > > >>>>>>> less than the one using Debian. Concretely 191MB in front of > 379MB. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Let me share with you the Dockerfile content: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> FROM alpine:3.2 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> RUN apk --update add bash > > >>>>>>> RUN apk --update add curl > > >>>>>>> RUN apk --update add openjdk7 > > >>>>>>> RUN apk --update add gnupg > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> # add our user and group first to make sure their IDs get > assigned > > >>>>>>> consistently, regardless of whatever dependencies get added > > >>>>>>> RUN addgroup -S tomee && adduser -S -G tomee tomee > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> ENV PATH /usr/local/tomee/bin:$PATH > > >>>>>>> RUN mkdir -p /usr/local/tomee > > >>>>>>> RUN chown tomee:tomee /usr/local/tomee > > >>>>>>> WORKDIR /usr/local/tomee > > >>>>>>> USER tomee > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> RUN curl -SL http://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS -o KEYS \ > > >>>>>>> && gpg --import KEYS > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> RUN curl -SL > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/tomee-1.7.2/apache-tomee-1.7.2-webprofile.tar.gz.asc > > >>>>>>> -o > > >>>>>>> tomee.tar.gz.asc > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> RUN curl -SL > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > http://apache.rediris.es/tomee/tomee-1.7.2/apache-tomee-1.7.2-webprofile.tar.gz > > >>>>>>> -o > > >>>>>>> tomee.tar.gz \ > > >>>>>>> && tar -zxvf tomee.tar.gz \ > > >>>>>>> && gpg --verify tomee.tar.gz.asc tomee.tar.gz \ > > >>>>>>> && mv apache-tomee-webprofile-1.7.2/* /usr/local/tomee \ > > >>>>>>> && rm -Rf apache-tomee-plus-1.7.2 \ > > >>>>>>> && rm bin/*.bat \ > > >>>>>>> && rm tomee.tar.gz* > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> EXPOSE 8080 > > >>>>>>> CMD ["catalina.sh", "run"] > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> But it has two drawback is that alpine 3.2 still don't have > support > > >> in > > >>>>>> APK > > >>>>>>> for openjdk8, but it will be added for alpine 3.3 so I am quite > > >>>>>> confident > > >>>>>>> that the best way to proceed is wait until it is released and > then > > >>>>>> update > > >>>>>>> our Dockerfile and finally release our image as official image > with > > >>>>>>> OpenJDK8. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> The second problem is that we are setting alpine linux as default > > >>>> image > > >>>>>> in > > >>>>>>> our distribution and not a more popular like Debian. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Another message I have seen while creating the image was this > one: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> gpg: Signature made Sun May 17 22:18:30 2015 UTC using DSA key ID > > >>>>>> D297D428 > > >>>>>>> gpg: Good signature from "Jonathan Gallimore < > > jgallim...@apache.org > > >>> " > > >>>>>>> [unknown] > > >>>>>>> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > > >>>>>>> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs > to > > >> the > > >>>>>>> owner. > > >>>>>>> Primary key fingerprint: DBCC D103 B8B2 4F86 FFAA B025 C8BB 472C > > >> D297 > > >>>>>> D428 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I don't know if Jonathan's key was not created by a trusted key. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Well that's all, let me know what you think about this change or > > what > > >>>>>> you > > >>>>>>> would like to see in official TomEE image. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Alex. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
