Would be better to request a git repo via https://reporeq.apache.org/ if you want a repository. You may also want to consider using gitwcsub instead of svnpubsub for the actual generated site.
John On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:15 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, let say if there is no -1 tonight I'll update the ticket to ask it - it > doesnt hurt worse case so dont think we need to wait much more, in > particular if we want to work on the website now. Let me know if it is a > concern at any level. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2017-07-04 15:04 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> > : > > > As in +1 for moving the project :-) > > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho < > > ivanjunc...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to date. > > >> > > >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha <daniels...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN. > > >> > PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last Jean-Louis's > > >> merge. > > >> > > > >> > But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a stage and > > the > > >> > process to deploy in prod will be identical. > > >> > > > >> > +1 for that. > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho < > > >> ivanjunc...@gmail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > This would be great, way better than doing svn patches. > > >> > > > > >> > > +1 > > >> > > > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi guys, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github but it > > >> looks > > >> > > hard, > > >> > > > they propose us to move the project to another git repo. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Anyone against it? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > For reference here is the ticket: > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or > > equivalent) > > >> and > > >> > > > have a github proxy. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we copy the > > >> output > > >> > > to > > >> > > > content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven > > plugin. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >> > > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog > > >> > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/ > > >> > > > rmannibucau> | > > >> > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE > > Factory > > >> > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Daniel Cunha > > >> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_ > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
