Hi Romain,
Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
<repositories>
<repository>
<id>my-tomee704repo</id>
<name>TomEE704 repo</name>
<url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
</repository>
</repositories>
(and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
which isn't yet officialized?
For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
<artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
<version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version -->
</dependency>
So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere on
tomee.apache.org?)
Best regards,
Alexandre
2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>
> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the
>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in TomEE
>> + 7.x).
>>
>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's
>> not being resolved:
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version -->
>> </dependency>
>>
>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>>
>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give feedback
>> on this RC before it's final.
>>
>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run my
>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using the
>> embedded adapter* ?
>>
>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is an
>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>:
>> > Hello Andy,
>> >
>> > And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1 based on
>> > my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+ 7.0.4
>> > vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>> >
>> > I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Alexandre
>> >
>> >
>> > 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <andy...@gmx.de>:
>> >> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+ binding
>> votes.
>> >> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the moment,
>> so I
>> >> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>> >>
>> >> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and checking
>> them
>> >> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
>> >> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always takes
>> >> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your help and
>> >> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested all
>> your
>> >> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>> >>
>> >> Andy Gumbrecht.
>> >>
>> >> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello Andy
>> >>>
>> >>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4 is
>> >>> supposed to last?
>> >>>
>> >>> Best regards,
>> >>> Alex
>> >>>
>> >>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fkjae...@gmail.com>:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> +1
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <agumbre...@tomitribe.com>:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Hi Everyone,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place
>> >>>>> your
>> >>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>> >>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Staging repo:
>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Source zip:
>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>> >>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>> >>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Dist area:
>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>> tomee-7.0.4/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Legal:
>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>> >>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Keys:
>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Changelog:
>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>> >>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Green buildbot:
>> >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>> >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Please vote:
>> >>>>> +1: Release
>> >>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>> >>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At
>> least 3
>> >>>>> binding votes).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you
>> >>>>> very
>> >>>>> much for your time.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>
>>
