If there is no other comment, any objection to move it to geronimo-jwt-auth? (let say if not we do it on monday european time)
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> 2018-03-06 11:11 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > 2018-03-06 10:24 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>: > >> Hi community, >> >> >> So we now have something close in terms of MP-JWT implementation. >> >> With the playground branch I've been working on (Thanks Romain for the >> help), we now pass 100% of the TCK (including a missing part in MP-JWT TCK >> I have eagerly added - see ticket on MP-JWT). >> >> Now the question is how do we proceed? >> Knowing that most of the code is not TomEE specific. >> > > I'd move it to G to a new git repo keeping only the tck exec - a bit like > Roberto started with config. I'll be happy to help fixing the small > remaining enhancements to do (jwt parsing based on jsonb/p, config etc). > > >> >> Only few things are in the TomcatSecurityService but that can remain in >> TomEE because it's not really MP-JWT specific either. >> > > +1, was overdue anyway for our servlet-ejb integration > > >> >> Here is the PR for discussion >> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/123 >> >> Cheers >> Jean-Louis >> >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> > >
