It would be great if you could take a look at it and fix it properly.

txs and LieGrue,
strub

> Am 09.06.2018 um 20:46 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
> 
> Hmm, if that's a regression due to openejb.scan.webapp.container change we
> should fix it otherwise we'll break a lot of users.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> 
> 
> Le sam. 9 juin 2018 à 18:48, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
> 
>> It also picks it up as 2 deplorable a...
>> 
>> Mit autocorrect gesendet
>> 
>>> Am 09.06.2018 um 18:02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]
>>> :
>>> 
>>> What is suspicious is that:
>>> 1. was working well for years
>>> 2. it is already isolated in tomee since we scan the deployable and not
>> the
>>> classpath for that reason
>>> 
>>> maybe the default scanning of the container change?
>>> 
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>> <
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le sam. 9 juin 2018 à 16:20, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> a
>>> écrit :
>>> 
>>>> commenting out adding the persistence.xml to the arquillian test makes
>> it
>>>> pass:
>>>> @Deployment
>>>> public static WebArchive archive() {
>>>>   return new WebModule(SubjectServiceTomEETest.class).getArchive()
>>>>           .addClass(VoteCounter.class)
>>>>           .addPackage(Subject.class.getPackage()) // domain
>>>>           //X .addAsWebInfResource(new
>>>> ClassLoaderAsset("META-INF/persistence.xml"), "persistence.xml")
>>>> 
>>>> We had such problems in OpenWebBeans as well. There we opted to isolate
>>>> the app away completely.That's one of the shortcomings of Arquilian in
>>>> practice. It sadly makes a difference whether you run it embedded vs
>>>> in-container vs remote-container :(
>>>> LieGrue,strub
>>>> 
>>>>   On Saturday, 9 June 2018, 16:13:52 CEST, Mark Struberg
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> It seems like one is coming from
>>>> 
>> file:/tmp/arquillian-tomee-app-working-dir/0/SubjectServiceTomEETest/#pollingthe
>>>> other from
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> file:/home/struberg/.m2/repository/jug/polling-domain/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT/polling-domain-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar#polling
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> As if it would be an Arquillian setup issue.I compared fb8 with master
>> but
>>>> could not find any differences though.
>>>> LieGrue,strub
>>>>   On Saturday, 9 June 2018, 14:28:38 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Can be a classloader change with a recent upgrade.
>>>> 
>>>> Le sam. 9 juin 2018 13:23, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I get a duplicate unit exception in
>>>>> jug.rest.arquillian.SubjectServiceTomEETest which is in
>> polling-web.This
>>>>> happens in the fb_tomee8 branch.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 0 = {TreeMap$Entry@5654}
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> "file:/home/struberg/.m2/repository/jug/polling-domain/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT/polling-domain-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar#client1"
>>>>> ->
>>>>> 1 = {TreeMap$Entry@5655}
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> "file:/home/struberg/.m2/repository/jug/polling-domain/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT/polling-domain-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar#client2"
>>>>> ->
>>>>> 2 = {TreeMap$Entry@5656}
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> "file:/home/struberg/.m2/repository/jug/polling-domain/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT/polling-domain-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar#polling"
>>>>> ->
>>>>> 3 = {TreeMap$Entry@5657}
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> "file:/tmp/arquillian-tomee-app-working-dir/0/SubjectServiceTomEETest/#client1"
>>>>> ->
>>>>> 4 = {TreeMap$Entry@5658}
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> "file:/tmp/arquillian-tomee-app-working-dir/0/SubjectServiceTomEETest/#client2"
>>>>> ->
>>>>> 5 = {TreeMap$Entry@5659}
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> "file:/tmp/arquillian-tomee-app-working-dir/0/SubjectServiceTomEETest/#polling"
>>>>> ->
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Anyone has an idea why?
>>>>> txs and LieGrue,strub
>>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to