I did not vote minus one because of that. I don't think we inject
Application very often, but the swagger team does.
If we don't add this change there, we will not be able to use...
<dependency>
<groupId>io.swagger.core.v3</groupId>
<artifactId>swagger-jaxrs2</artifactId>
<version>2.0.1</version>
</dependency>
INFO org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.CxfRsHttpListener logEndpoints
Service URI: http://localhost:8080/api/openapi -> Pojo
io.swagger.v3.jaxrs2.integration.resources.AcceptHeaderOpenApiResource
INFO org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.CxfRsHttpListener logEndpoints
GET http://localhost:8080/api/openapi/ ->
Response getOpenApiJson(HttpHeaders, UriInfo) throws Exception
INFO org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.CxfRsHttpListener logEndpoints
GET http://localhost:8080/api/openapi/ ->
Response getOpenApiYaml(HttpHeaders, UriInfo) throws Exception
INFO org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.CxfRsHttpListener logEndpoints
Service URI: http://localhost:8080/api/openapi.{type:json|yaml} -> Pojo
io.swagger.v3.jaxrs2.integration.resources.OpenApiResource
INFO org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.CxfRsHttpListener logEndpoints
GET http://localhost:8080/api/openapi.{type:json|yaml}/ ->
Response getOpenApi(HttpHeaders, UriInfo, String) throws Exception
... with this version of TomEE.
It's not critical; But if we re-roll, it would be awesome to add that in
there.
[]s,
Thiago.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:50 PM Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Is this really a common case?
>
> I'd rather would continue the vote and ship a 7.0.1 shortly afterwards
> (say 2 weeks).
>
> That way we can get feedback from users and improve upon it.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 31.08.2018 um 17:25 schrieb Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Sweet! Tx!
> >
> > []s,
> > Thiago.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:20 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Assuming we re-roll (which looks likely), yes, I'll include it.
> >>
> >> Jon
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:12 PM Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The change I did for the the Injection of Application seems to be out
> of
> >>> this release. :/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/bf929780ae384de305388594c7227c73a3193f9a
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2201
> >>>
> >>> Do you mind if we add it to 71x?
> >>>
> >>> []s,
> >>> Thiago.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:01 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> >>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Roberto - did you have a test/sample app for this?
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks like the microprofile zip is short of a NOTICE file, and that
> >> would
> >>>> need to include the same notices as webprofile, plus this one:
> >>>>
> >>>> (
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://bitbucket.org/b_c/jose4j/src/7f9624414a1baf752adbc61d4a1be16253eeec23/NOTICE.txt?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default
> >>>> )
> >>>> -----
> >>>> jose4j
> >>>> Copyright 2012-2015 Brian Campbell
> >>>>
> >>>> EcdsaUsingShaAlgorithm contains code for converting the concatenated
> >>>> R & S values of the signature to and from DER, which was originally
> >>>> derived from the Apache Santuario XML Security library's
> SignatureECDSA
> >>>> implementation. http://santuario.apache.org/
> >>>>
> >>>> The Base64 implementation in this software was derived from the
> >>>> Apache Commons Codec project.
> >>>> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-codec/
> >>>>
> >>>> JSON processing in this software was derived from the JSON.simple
> >>> toolkit.
> >>>> https://code.google.com/p/json-simple/
> >>>> -----
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>
> >>>> Other than that I can't see any issues.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jon
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:39 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you very much Jon for the release and Roberto for the
> >>> microprofile
> >>>>> work
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Mark Struberg
> >>> <[email protected]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>>>>> strub
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Am 30.08.2018 um 12:24 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore <
> >>>>>> [email protected]>:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Here is the first roll of TomEE 7.1.0. Please can you take a look
> >>> and
> >>>>>>> vote? Everyone,
> >>>>>>> committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Staging repo:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1119
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Source zip:
> >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>>>>> orgapachetomee-1119/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.
> >>>>>> 1.0/tomee-project-7.1.0-source-release.zip
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Dist area:
> >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1119/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Legal:
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1119/legal.zip
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Keys:
> >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Please vote:
> >>>>>>> +1: Release
> >>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At
> >>>> least
> >>>>> 3
> >>>>>>> binding votes).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Many thanks
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jon
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
