I think plume was more a webprofile with oracle defaults providers, we
added a few lib cause of requests but we now hit the limit of that strategy
so we should probably revert it maybe?

In companies you often maintain your own distro anyway to add enterprise
specific monitoring solutions (backends), configuration and so on so the
deployable is the distro and not just a war.
This applies to docker indeed but any deployment actually (from ansible to
the plain old scp). You still deploy a 'tomcat' and can apply the
monitoring technics to the instance, even if you customized the stack. The
main advantage is you can dev with the custom distro without having to
predownload it which is a game changer in the EE habits.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le dim. 14 oct. 2018 à 15:01, j4fm <james.m...@my-managed.net> a écrit :

> I just understood that Plus was supposed to include everything from RS plus
> more. And PluME included everything from Plus and more.  That seems to not
> be the case anymore.  Now, Plus contains stuff not in PluMe and RS/MP
> contains stuff not in either and the comparisons page doesn't reflect this
> either.
>
> I'm not requesting that more use-cases are supported, just to maintain that
> an "edition contains smaller edition plus more" approach as it was before
> rather than them becoming all different.
>
> Sure, thanks for the suggestion.  That's an option but not ideal in most
> cases.  The end-user currently downloads and installs pre-requisites like
> TomEE independently and they are responsible for updates.  We'd have to
> distribute our own tomee and maintain updates/patches as well as our main
> releases.  It could work for Docker based scenario though if we use
> multi-stage build for TomEE.
>
> Thanks again
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>

Reply via email to