I'm ok with cross-posting. If something isn't relevant or no-longer
relevant, its easy enough to drop the list that isn't relevant.

Jon

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 8:40 PM David Blevins <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thank you so much, Thomas, for taking a lead on the TomEE 8 startup speed!
>
> Forwarding your notes to dev@tomee so everyone can see the hard work
> you're putting in.
>
> Hey, all, what do we think about cross-posting?  If someone is doing
> awesome TomEE work in other communities, say BVal, OpenWebBeans, MyFaces,
> etc, should we encourage them to also add dev@tomee in the Cc?  Other
> communities may not want our noise, but seems we could easily say "we're ok
> being in Cc for work in your community that in some way relates to TomEE.
> Go ahead and cc dev@tomee, we're cool with it.  We even like it as it
> helps us better know the communities behind the code in TomEE."
>
> Seems it could help unite us a bit more.
>
> If we like the idea, we could just add a document to the website that says
> "go ahead, we don't mind. we like it."  Then people could do it without
> worrying that it might be bad etiquette.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> > On Oct 12, 2018, at 7:15 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > as you already may know from the TomEE/BVal mailing list, i'm not happy
> > with the startup performance since TomEE8.
> >
> > TomEE7 OWB startup ~ 4,5seconds
> > TomEE8 OWB startup ~ 9seconds
> >
> > i finally managed to improve the performance on 2 places.
> >
> > 1) Filter framework classes in BVal on PAT
> >    Reduces the startup to ~8seconds
> >
> > 2) Cache obervers for systemEvents in
> NotificationManager#resolveObservers
> >    Reduces the starup to ~7 seconds
> >    Patch:
> > https://gist.github.com/tandraschko/de4c72c22e65aaefe041af5a15d110e3
> >
> > Do you think the patch is ok or could it break something?
> > I would be happy if mark or romain could improve it :D
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Thomas
>
>

Reply via email to