Hi Bruno,

I assume the alternative is activated in the beans.xml? (if not try adding
a @Priority maybe or just drop the annotation which should be useless)

If it is i'd start by writing a small test (with application composer) to
check if it is a bug in tomee cause this is how it must work

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le ven. 16 nov. 2018 à 12:44, Bruno Baptista <bruno...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi Roman,
>
> This is what I did and it doesn't work. The original bean is always picked
> up:
>
> @Specializes@Alternative@ApplicationScopedpublic class 
> FailsafeContainerExecutionManagerProvider extends 
> FailsafeExecutionManagerProvider {
>
>     @Inject    private ManagedScheduledExecutorService executor;
>
>     @Produces    @ApplicationScoped    @Override    public ExecutionManager 
> createExecutionManager() throws Exception {
>
>
>         final MicroprofileAnnotationMapper mapper = 
> MicroprofileAnnotationMapper.getInstance();
>         final DefaultExecutorServiceProvider executorServiceProvider = new 
> DefaultExecutorServiceProvider(executor);
>         final BulkheadManagerImpl bulkheadManager = new BulkheadManagerImpl();
>         final FailsafeCircuitBreakerManager circuitBreakerManager = new 
> FailsafeCircuitBreakerManager();
>         final FailsafeRetryManager retryManager = new FailsafeRetryManager();
>
>         return new FailsafeExecutionManager(
>                 mapper,
>                 bulkheadManager,
>                 circuitBreakerManager,
>                 retryManager,
>                 new ExecutionPlanFactory(circuitBreakerManager, retryManager, 
> bulkheadManager, mapper,
>                         executorServiceProvider),
>                 executorServiceProvider);
>     }
> }
>
>
> I feel that this needs to be done in a different way... Would you be able
> to point me to a similar override currently being done?
>
> Cheers
> Bruno Baptista
> https://twitter.com/brunobat_
> http://tomitribe.com
> https://tribestream.io
> Bruno Baptista
> http://twitter.com/brunobat_
>
>
> On 16/11/18 10:28, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> it is a palin bean so @Specializes works, did you put it on the method?
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> 
> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> 
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old 
> Blog<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | 
> Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | 
> Book<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>  <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le ven. 16 nov. 2018 à 11:00, Bruno Baptista <bruno...@gmail.com> 
> <bruno...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> We have a problem with the integration of the Safeguard Fault Tolerance
> library on TomEE 8 and I need help to solve it. This is a follow up to
> the original email thread, from Oct 3, in the Geronimo mailing list,
> where we decided to do perform the override in the container side.
>
> I need to override the starting point for the library, originally here:
>
> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-safeguard/blob/master/safeguard-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/safeguard/impl/cdi/FailsafeExecutionManagerProvider.java
>
> Because it's not using a managed executor service from TomEE... Like
> this one: "java:comp/DefaultManagedScheduledExecutorService"
>
> I Expect to do the wiring in here
> .../apache-tomee/tomee/tomee-microprofile-webapp/src
>
> Like using a @Specializes bean or something, but I think we cannot do
> that there. Could someone help me wire up this new bean?
>
> I had a PR to fix this the lib itself but it was decided not to move
> with it. For the curious, it's 
> here:https://github.com/apache/geronimo-safeguard/pull/2
>
> Cheers
> --
> Bruno Baptistahttp://twitter.com/brunobat_
>
>
>

Reply via email to