"Actually, kinda interested. I think we'd need to include MicroProfile in
TomEE Plus and TomEE Plume though."

I'm totally agree.
Do we already have the CI running TomEE build with java 11?

Em seg, 19 de nov de 2018 às 13:14, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Java 11 is definitely a priority. Personally, I'd rather get a regular
> milestone releases, rather than waiting for everything Java 11-wise to be
> in place.
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 4:03 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm not a commiter but a full java11 support is very important.
> > But probably all open stories are very important :D
> >
> >
> > Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:46 Uhr schrieb Roberto Cortez
> > <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Following up our initial push to have a Milestone Release of TomEE 8, I
> > > think we need to figure out the remaining steps to a final version:
> > >
> > > - Update MP specs to the latests and support at least MP 2.0 spec.
> > > - Provide MP support for other TomEE flavours: Plus, Plume, etc.
> > > - Implement Java EE Security API.
> > >
> > > These are for me the main blockers.
> > >
> > > I know there is a Java 9+ effort to provide TomEE with the latest Java
> > > support. I think that is still on the early stages and nobody can say
> for
> > > certain how long is that going to take, so I wouldn’t like to delay the
> > > final TomEE 8 release because of it.
> > >
> > > Now, that doesn’t mean if need to wait a year or so for it. I know that
> > > historically TomEE release are like big bang and it is in our hand to
> > > change it and make it better. My point is that we can release a TomEE 9
> > > version with Java 11 support in a few months.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Roberto
> >
>


-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Reply via email to