The build on my Windows machine here ran for ages, and then the machine
rebooted for some weird reason. It seemed to get further through the
openejb-core tests than yours from the log I have here. Going to run it
again. Thanks for including the command, that is really useful.

For completeness, here's my java -version and mvn -v output:

jon@DESKTOP-D9NMDPA /cygdrive/c/Users/jon/dev/tomee
$ java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0_181"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 1.8.0_181-b13)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 25.181-b13, mixed mode)

jon@DESKTOP-D9NMDPA /cygdrive/c/Users/jon/dev/tomee
$ mvn -v
Apache Maven 3.5.4 (1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe;
2018-06-17T19:33:14+01:00)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.5.4
Java version: 1.8.0_181, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
C:\Java\jdk8u181-b13\jre
Default locale: en_GB, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"

I can try different JDK versions if we think that might be a factor.

Cheers

Jon

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 7:10 AM Ferdi <d...@ferdi.id> wrote:

> I've tried changing to that version as well, didn't work.
>
> If I run the command that broke the test:
>
> "C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_161\jre\bin\java"
>
> -javaagent:C:\Users\Ferdi_S672\Documents\Personal\Projects\tomee\container\openejb-core\target\openejb-javaagent-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>
> -Dopenejb.classloader.forced-skip=org.apache.openejb.jee.,org.apache.openejb.api.
> -Dopenejb.classloader.forced-load=org.apache.openejb -enableassertions
> -Dopenejb.descriptors.output.folder=./dump/
> -Dorg.apache.activemq.SERIALIZABLE_PACKAGES=org,java -jar
>
> C:\Users\FERDI_~1\AppData\Local\Temp\surefire4923413819281954940\surefirebooter7579699950053744316.jar
> C:\Users\Ferdi_S672\AppData\Local\Temp\surefire4923413819281954940
> 2018-11-27T15-00-14_583-jvmRun1 surefire7936970543296277600tmp
> surefire_04537004988640125092tmp
>
> I got this:
>
> # Created at 2018-11-27T15:08:14.729
> System.exit() or native command error interrupted process checker.
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot use PPID 5228 process
> information. Going to use NOOP events.
>         at
>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.PpidChecker.checkProcessInfo(PpidChecker.java:155)
>         at
>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.PpidChecker.isProcessAlive(PpidChecker.java:116)
>         at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter$2.run(ForkedBooter.java:214)
>         at
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
>         at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:308)
>         at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
>         at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:294)
>         at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
>         at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>
> On 11/26/2018 8:02 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> > Going to fire this off on a Linux and a Windows machine here to see a)
> if I
> > see the same thing, and b) see if I can give some pointers. I don't have
> > ideas right off the top of my head at the moment. Romain's suggestion is
> > definitely worth a try.
> >
> > For reference, we have a CI build here:
> > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8 - it doesn't look
> > like we have the same issue there (we have different ones!)
> >
> > Thanks for trying this - and thanks for trying it on a Windows machine
> too,
> > its good to know whether it is or isn't working there.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:55 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ferdi,
> >>
> >> surefire got some "hiccup" in last versions, maybe try 3.0.0-M1 or or
> >> 2.22.1 which should work, if not the output dump can help sometimes to
> >> identify if it is a memory issue or (more likely) another one.
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to