Ticket filed. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17417

I believe its basically automated - the git-wip remote will become a gitbox
remote. I'll ask about the PRs.

Jon

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:06 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:

> Do you know how smooth it will be?
> I mean, what about current PRs?
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:58 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Looks like we have good support for this, so I'll get this started.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:44 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Folks
> > >
> > > It appears that the git-wip service is going to be retired, and the
> > > repositories are going to be migrated over to Gitbox -
> > > https://gitbox.apache.org/.
> > >
> > > We can voluntarily move to GitBox anytime between now and January 9th
> > > 2019. After January 9th, Infra will require us to move to move within
> one
> > > month by February 7th 2019.
> > >
> > > I propose that we be proactive and look to move now, and we should get
> > the
> > > benefits of better GitHub integration, which given that we are seeing
> > > bigger numbers of PRs coming through GitHub, this seems to make sense
> to
> > me.
> > >
> > > I'm happy to work with infra, and provide guidance to everyone on this
> > > list. We don't necessarily need a vote, but we do need consensus on
> this
> > > list in order to move ahead.
> > >
> > > Are there any objections or other feedback?
> > >
> > > Many thanks
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to