Merged!

Happy new year to you and everyone in the community too.

Jon

On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 2:39 PM Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Jon
> I have created new pull request. Could you please check,
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/334
>
> Happy New Year!
>
> Regards.
> Gurkan
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 5:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Awesome, thanks. I'm ok with this change:
> >
> > -                moduleLocations.removeIf(file -> !match((String)
> modules,
> > file));
> > -
> > +                for (final Iterator<File> i =
> moduleLocations.iterator();
> > i.hasNext(); ) {
> > +                    final File file = i.next();
> > +                    if (!match((String) modules, file)) {
> > +                        i.remove();
> > +                    }
> > +                }
> >
> > I don't think anyone else has expressed an opinion one way or another, so
> > I'd leave your for-loop as it is.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 2:07 PM Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jon
> > > I will update my patch to update wildcard import, loop and diamond <>
> > > operator.
> > > Regards
> > > Gurkan
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 2:38 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there any particular reason for flipping the imports to wildcards?
> > We
> > > > tend to import the individual classes elsewhere in the codebase. My
> > > > personal preference would be to leave those as individual imports. It
> > > > doesn't make the import list that much longer, and I find its clearer
> > > what
> > > > is being imported and used. IDEs tend to fold those away unless
> you're
> > > > specifically looking at them too.
> > > >
> > > > I think like the other changes, and do think it looks neater and
> easier
> > > to
> > > > read.
> > > >
> > > > I personally prefer
> > > >
> > > > map = new HashMap<>();
> > > >
> > > > over
> > > >
> > > > map = new HashMap<Object, Object>();
> > > >
> > > > but I don't think that's a big deal.
> > > >
> > > > I also note this change:
> > > >
> > > > -                moduleLocations.removeIf(file -> !match((String)
> > > modules,
> > > > file));
> > > > -
> > > > +                for (final Iterator<File> i =
> > > moduleLocations.iterator();
> > > > i.hasNext(); ) {
> > > > +                    final File file = i.next();
> > > > +                    if (!match((String) modules, file)) {
> > > > +                        i.remove();
> > > > +                    }
> > > > +                }
> > > >
> > > > Which is changing from a lambda to a loop. I'd probably have done it
> > like
> > > > this, but the effect is the same:
> > > >
> > > >                 final Iterator<File> iterator =
> > > moduleLocations.iterator();
> > > >                 while (iterator.hasNext()) {
> > > >                     final File file = iterator.next();
> > > >                     if (!match((String) modules, file)) {
> > > >                         iterator.remove();
> > > >                     }
> > > >                 }
> > > >
> > > > IntelliJ is definitely preferring the moduleLocations.removeIf, and
> > will
> > > > refactor both of those loops to it with one keystroke. I have the
> what
> > is
> > > > probably an unpopular opinion which is that I actually prefer the
> loop
> > > over
> > > > the lambda. The reasons are:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Backporting changes is much harder when you have to work around
> > > language
> > > > changes like this
> > > > 2. I personally find lots of things crammed into one line harder to
> > read,
> > > > and in this particular case, there's a cast and a negation (so a
> double
> > > > negative) in the removeIf.
> > > >
> > > > Jon
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 10:21 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yep, I'll take a look. Thanks for the PR.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jon
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 9:10 AM Gurkan Erdogdu <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi
> > > > >> I have created a PR (https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/332)
> for
> > > > >> (TOMEE-2435)
> > > > >> Simplify the Code in org.apache.openejb.OpenEjbContainer$Provider
> > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2435>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> If anybody can check and merge, it is appreciated :)
> > > > >> Regards.
> > > > >> Gurkan
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to