One thing I saw happening too, is when I add the annotation below it doesn't get added to openapi.
@RequestBody(content = @Content(schema = @Schema(implementation = Sms.class))) Is that because it is under development? On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:38 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes Ivan, array mapping is in progress. In the meantime you can define > your schema to ensure you control it and the implicit representation does > not depends on the way the impl parses it - which can not match your > underlying mapper. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 14:23, Ivan Junckes Filho <ivanjunc...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > >> Looks like it is fixed in the master, but when I get the lib and add to >> tomee it shows some bad behavior with the schemas. >> >> [image: image.png] >> >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:09 AM Ivan Junckes Filho < >> ivanjunc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> No I didn't, I will have a look. thanks >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:08 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < >>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ivan, >>>> >>>> Did you test on the snapshot? we got some enhancements about it. >>>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>> < >>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 14:03, Ivan Junckes Filho < >>>> ivanjunc...@gmail.com> a >>>> écrit : >>>> >>>> > Hey guys, I think there is an issue with parameters as the "in" >>>> property >>>> > is required by the spec and is not showing up. This affects >>>> swagger-ui as >>>> > it doesn't replace uf by the actual value. Anyone aware of this issue? >>>> > >>>> > { >>>> > "openapi": "3.0.1", >>>> > "paths": { >>>> > "/test/{uf}": { >>>> > "get": { >>>> > "deprecated": false, >>>> > "description": "Test by UF.", >>>> > "operationId": "test", >>>> > "parameters": [ >>>> > { >>>> > "name": "uf", >>>> > "required": true, >>>> > "schema": { >>>> > "type": "string" >>>> > }, >>>> > "style": "simple" >>>> > } >>>> > ], >>>> > "responses": { >>>> > "200": { >>>> > "content": { >>>> > "application/json": { >>>> > "schema": { >>>> > "deprecated": false, >>>> > "exclusiveMaximum": false, >>>> > "exclusiveMinimum": false, >>>> > "items": { >>>> > >>>> > }, >>>> > "maxLength": 2147483647, >>>> > "minLength": 0, >>>> > "nullable": false, >>>> > "properties": { >>>> > >>>> > }, >>>> > "readOnly": false, >>>> > "uniqueItems": false, >>>> > "writeOnly": false >>>> > } >>>> > } >>>> > }, >>>> > "description": "Success" >>>> > }, >>>> > "400": { >>>> > "content": { >>>> > "200": { >>>> > >>>> > } >>>> > }, >>>> > "description": "Bad Request" >>>> > } >>>> > }, >>>> > >>>> > } >>>> > }, >>>> > >>>> > } >>>> > ] >>>> > } >>>> > >>>> >>>
