Thanks for starting the discussion. #7 (or #9) would get my vote too. Jon
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 1:25 PM j4fm <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello > > Currently the TomEE Docker images are labelled with JRE. However, with > OpenJDK 11 there is no JRE anymore. The openjdk:11-jre is not supported in > the official Docker repository (even though it exists, oddly). > > So now our TomEE images for OpenJDK 11 are using openjdk:11.0-JDK but still > marked JRE. > > We need to decide on a solution: > > 1. Relabel our 11+ images as JDK and keep the current parent > openjdk:11.0-jdk image - 604MB based on debian:stretch. > 2. Switch to adoptopenjdk/openjdk11:latest (JDK) – 421MB and based on > ubuntu:18.04 > 3. Switch to adoptopenjdk/openjdk11:slim (JDK) – 346MB and based on > ubuntu:18.04 > 4. Switch to adoptopenjdk/openjdk11:jre – 224MB and based on ubuntu:18.04 > 5. Switch to adoptopenjdk/openjdk11:debian (JDK) – 458MB and based on > debian:stretch > 6. Switch to adoptopenjdk/openjdk11:debian-slim (JDK) – 368MB and based on > debian:stretch > 7. Switch to adoptopenjdk/openjdk11:debian-jre – 260MB and based on > debian:stretch > 8. Release both JRE and JDK images based on adoptopenjdk Debian based > releases > 9. Release both JRE and JDK images based on adoptopenjdk Ubuntu based > releases. > > My preference would be to keep a Debian based image as in the past (for > backwards compatibility) and so either #7 (AdoptOpenJDK Debian JRE) or #9 > (same but with JDK available too). > > I'm happy to do a PR for our Dockerfiles as required but put this out for > discussion. > > Thank you > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html >
