Hello, +1 : I appreciate Mark's concern wit dependencies licenses Since we're at this, JAXB license doesn't seem so Apache-friendly : Jon is working on upgrading 7.1.x to JAXB 2.3.2, and he mentionned this link for JAXB source: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaxb-api/tree/2.3.2. This later page mentions an EDL 1.0 licence which sounds rather unlike usual Apache's. Isn't there a Geronimo replacement for JAXB which could be shipped in TomEE to avoid it ?
Kind regards, Alexandre Vermeerbergen Le mar. 13 août 2019 à 22:28, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a écrit : > > I'd rather roll a Geronimo-activation-1.2 spec. > > EPL is a weak copyleft license. That means shipping with an EPL dependency > has a legal impact on downstream consumers. That's the reason why it is only > CatB. > Rolling the few missing enhancements should really be easy. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 13.08.2019 um 06:33 schrieb David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>: > > > > With the latest Java 11 changes we have two copies and versions of the > > javax.activation specification in our dist. > > > > - geronimo-activation_1.1_spec (via javaee-api-8.0) > > - jakarta.activation-1.2.1.jar > > > > The Jakarta EE 8 version of Activation should be 1.2. There is no Geronimo > > Activation 1.2 available. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2618 > > > > > > -- > > David Blevins > > http://twitter.com/dblevins > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > >