Now that the JSONB spec jar is released, I  pushed the changes to move to
non snapshot dependencies.

Question guys: are the changes for passing TCK small so we do a 1.1.14 or
do we consider they are significant enough to produce a 1.2 instead?

thoughts?
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 12:05 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> As mentionned in the related thread ("JSON-B and JSON-P TCKs") it sounds ok
> for me.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le lun. 9 sept. 2019 à 11:57, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>
> a écrit :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Romain and Mark have done a great work with the TCK. I'd like to open up
> a
> > vote to get a release out and fill a certification request like this one
> >
> > https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsonb-api/issues/175
> >
> > Any problem?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
>

Reply via email to