I think a good start would be to publish the testresults somewhere, so we
can check them.
I could e.g. handle JSF tests.

Am Di., 22. Okt. 2019 um 15:01 Uhr schrieb Richard Monson-Haefel <
[email protected]>:

> Excellent question and response, guys!
>
> I think that we need to organize a campaign/project/effort to address any
> tests in the Jakarta EE 8 TCK that are not being passed at this time. One
> way to do that is piecemeal, everyone run tests and find things to change.
> Another way would require more coordination. In that second scenario, we
> would try to coordinate the running of the TCK on TomEE, document the
> failed tests, and then divvy up the work so that we can, as a community,
> move forward with Jakarta EE 8 compliance.
>
> I would love to hear others' thoughts on this and people's willingness to
> help.  It will take a bit to figure it out all out but once a process is in
> place it could be easy for others, new to TomEE, to join in and help get
> this done.
>
> David, what are your thoughts on this?  If anyone else has ideas lets hear
> them!
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 6:45 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi David
> >
> > Do you have the TCK and the tomee-tck project set up?
> > https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck
> >
> > If you do, and you're able to run something like this:
> >
> > ./runtests --web tomee-plume
> > com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30.bb.localaccess.statelessclient
> >
> > We'll get you started with some test failures to look at. Failures come
> in
> > a few different forms - some are setup issues, and others are genuine
> > implementation issues. We have some EJB failures that would be great to
> get
> > you started and I can guide you through.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:28 PM David Salter <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >             Hi all,Do we have a roadmap on what needs to be done to
> > become
> > > Jakarta EE8 compliant?For example, are there any specific Jira tickets
> > > etc.Apologies if this has been discussed before, but I’d love to help
> us
> > > move in this direction where possible. ThanksDavid.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Richard Monson-Haefel
> https://twitter.com/rmonson
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/monsonhaefel/
>

Reply via email to