That's very useful context - thanks for that. I'll recheck with the application I have here. It could be the case that this has been "unlucky" to a certain extent to have been working ok on 7.1.1, and broken after that with the revert back to the 7.1.0 behaviour. I'll also see how this lines up with the 7.0.x branch. The two branches should line up, with the key difference being addition of MicroProfile and raising the minimum Java level to Java SE 8. It looks like TomEEJsonbProvider isn't a thing in the TomEE 7.x branch at first glance.
Jon On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM Zowalla, Richard < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jon, > > the related issue was https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2565 > with a lot of comments documenting the issues, which were fixed with this > commit. > > The original change was conducted in 2018: > https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/4302acab62bb64c2d77cce3a66b92ae7e9cff7c5 > and already affected end-users of 7.1.0 -> 7.1.1 > > In > https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/424ea0f0121604b58f140bbf4d6233be5874591c#diff-b22ad18567f14c1bdba3fa795bd10535 > , we changed the default provider list back to the previous values of > 7.1.x. as it was before > https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/4302acab62bb64c2d77cce3a66b92ae7e9cff7c5 > and already affected end-users of 7.1.0 -> 7.1.1 > > Best, > Richard > > Am Montag, den 02.12.2019, 14:19 +0000 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > > Hey folks > > > We had this change a while back: > > https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/424ea0f0121604b58f140bbf4d6233be5874591c#diff-b22ad18567f14c1bdba3fa795bd10535 > > > This looks like a good change in the context of EE8 (master) but is a > > breaking change on the 7.1.x branch (EE7). JAX-RS 2.0 does appear to > > reference JSON-B as far as I can see. > > > Any objections? Richard Z (@rzo1)? > > > Thanks > > > Jon > > > -- > > >
