Hi Jon,

Thank you very much for having handled the huge work of releasing
7.0.7, 7.1.2 and 8.0.1 versions of Apache TomEE.
I see all links are up to date at TomEE's download page:
http://tomee.apache.org/download-ng.html

Kind regards,
Alexandre

Le lun. 20 janv. 2020 à 10:49, Jonathan Gallimore
<[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> Hi All,
>
> We've had the following votes:
>
> +1s:
>
> Marco Ferreira
> Daniel Cunha
> Daniel Dias Dos Santos
> Cesar Hernandez
> Richard Zowalla
> Richard Monson-Haefel
> Martin Wiesner
> Alexandre Vermeerbergen
> Jonathan Gallimore (binding)
> Mark Struberg (binding)
> David Blevins (binding)
>
> We have no other votes (0 or -1) so this vote passes, and I'll promote the
> release artifacts and add the release to the website.
>
> Many thanks everyone for voting!
>
> Jon
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 10:18 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Here's a second attempt at roll of a TomEE 8.0.1. Please can you take a
> > careful look, review, test and provide feedback.
> >
> > Maven Repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1161/
> >
> > Binaries & Source:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1161/tomee-8.0.1/
> >
> > Tag:
> >
> >
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-8.0.1
> >
> > Release notes:
> >
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12346179
> >
> > The previous votes were cancelled after an issue was found with TomEE
> > 7.1.2 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2758) and the release
> > for 7.0.7 had incorrect artifacts. The binary here should be the same as
> > the previous vote, so if you were ok with that, theoretically this one
> > should be ok too - but please check.
> >
> > Please VOTE:
> >
> > [+1] Yes, release it
> > [+0] Not fussed
> > [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
> > showstopper is)
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours or as needed.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jon
> >

Reply via email to