Dammit, accidentally hit send far too soon. Here's the whole message:
Hi folks Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far. I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to briefly address. The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You can't vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I can cancel this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we wish. I didn't do this on this occasion, because we're producing the binary that uses javax (8.0.4) and then transforming it to produce the version that uses jakarta (9.0.0-M2), but can do so going forward. We don't expect 9.0.0-M2 to be perfect. We're grateful if you can report issues you find, but that shouldn't necessarily block the release. I totally understand that migrating your own projects to the jakarta namespace is a big deal and unlikely to be feasible for a vote. If you can check you can download it and boot it up, and check for any legal issues, bad libraries etc, that helps. If you'd like an example app to try, do try building the moviefun example. That (like many of the examples) produces both javax and jakarta .war files. Jean-Louis is going to run the TCK against this, which is fantastic. A couple of notes here to set expectations - I'm not expecting a full pass, but I'm also not expecting regressions, so passing the TCK shouldn't block the release. I did have to comment out the new security module (sorry - there were some JAX-RS test failures with it), so those tests still won't pass. Hope that all makes sense, but please ask any questions you may have. Many thanks again for your reviews. Jon On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks > > Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far. > > I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to > briefly address. > > The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You can't > vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I can close > this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we wish. > > I didn't, because we're producing the binary that uses javax (8.0.4) and > then transforming it to produce the version that uses jakarta (9.0.0-M2). > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache >> TomEE 8.0.4. >> >> >> Maven Repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/ >> >> Binaries & Source: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/ >> >> Source code: >> TomEE 8.0.4: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip >> TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip >> >> Tags: >> >> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4 >> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2 >> >> Release notes: >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12348414 >> >> Please VOTE: >> >> [+1] Yes, release it >> [+0] Not fussed >> [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the >> showstopper is) >> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours. >> >> Here is my +1. >> >> Thanks >> >> Jon >> >
