Hi, thanks for your work!
Could you add the related job configuration / maven configuration used for these build jobs? We would like to replicate it on our university infrastructure as well. Thanks! Best Richard Am Donnerstag, den 03.12.2020, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > Hi community, > > As I'm actively working on TCK, I might break stuff when pushing > changes. > Without CI it's quite hard to know where you are and where you go. > > So I went and spent some time this morning to rework a bit of our CI > on > Jenkins. > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/ > > I created a couple of jobs > > *master-sanity-checks* (triggered on commit) > The goal here is to run checkstyle, pmd, rat and a quick compile of > sources > without tests. > This is because our full build takes a lot of time, and it's > frustrating to > pretty much be at the end of the build and realize you missed an > unused > import and the full build is aborted. > > *master-build-quick* (triggered after sanity checks if successful) > If the previous build passes, this one is triggered and runs a clean > install with profile quick. Does not run examples, all arquillian > adapters, > tck and itests. > Not sure if it's relevant, but it runs minimum things to have a good > confidence on TomEE build. > > *master-build-full* (executed every day) > This one does not run on commit. It can be executed manually or it > will run > every day anyway. > It runs everything possible in TomEE but it will take hours. > > *master-owasp-check* (to be triggered manually). For the moment it > takes > too much time to have it in other builds. To be discussed. > > I pushed some changes already to codebase in order to add missing > headers, > and fix the build already. So far sanity passed and triggered the > quick. > I'll monitor and see what happens > > > What do you think? > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 8:33 AM Zowalla, Richard < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Cesar, > > > > we have the following configuration: > > > > - Latest OpenJDK 8 > > - Maven 3.6.3 > > - only execute it on Linux Slavs > > - We have "clean install -Pall-adapters"-Command (similar to Apache > > Jenkins - I think we copied the config from it). I now added "-U -- > > show-version --fail-at-end" to align the Maven command with the > > Apache > > CI configuration. > > - No Post-Build actions (for now) > > > > Best > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 18.11.2020, 12:10 -0600 schrieb Cesar Hernandez: > > > @Richard Zowalla, > > > > > > In terms of Jenkis job configuration, what is your Job > > > configuration > > > set up > > > in the University? > > > > > > Current Apache TomEE master job has the following configurations: > > > > > > -Java: latest Java 8 > > > -Maven: 3.3.9 version with MAVEN_OPTS -Xmx1536m > > > -Maven command: -U --show-version --fail-at-end clean install > > > -Pall- > > > adapters > > > -Junit patter for post-build actions: **/target/surefire- > > > reports/TEST-*.xml > > > > > > Buildbot had 3 steps (temp folder creation, checkstyle, pmd, > > > install > > > without test) before executing the full project tests. > > > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1426 > > > I wonder if you included the same steps build bot has or if you > > > went > > > straight to `clean install` like the Job we currently have in > > > Apache > > > CI Job. > > > > > > El mié., 18 nov. 2020 a las 5:12, Jonathan Gallimore (< > > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > > > > > I'll dig into the log... thanks for the pointers. Its too bad > > > > that > > > > Jenkins > > > > shows the modules in a weird order though. Things like that add > > > > to > > > > my > > > > frustration with it. > > > > > > > > Jon > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 9:06 AM Zowalla, Richard < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Jon, > > > > > > > > > > the module order shown on the start page does not necessarily > > > > > reflect the > > > > > build order. > > > > > > > > > > We are building TomEE Master from GitHub on our university > > > > > Jenkins CI > > > > > infrastructure as well. > > > > > > > > > > Afaik, the module order is hidden in the CI log files: > > > > > > > > > > CI University: > > > > > https://gist.github.com/rzo1/aded63855dbabda57ab11a89188ada68 > > > > > CI Apache: > > > > > https://gist.github.com/rzo1/0fe6cb8c67fab5ded2ab566e30b7a4e3 > > > > > > > > > > Looking at both CI logs, the build order is: > > > > > > > > > > Core > > > > > Assembly > > > > > Zips > > > > > Integration > > > > > > > > > > as one would expect or did I miss something, Jon? > > > > > > > > > > Best > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > FYI: The latest CI Job on our infrastructure failed with 10 > > > > > tests > > > > > (tck > > > > > beanvalidation): > > > > > https://gist.github.com/rzo1/05ff7f30c034c66355cb95363b35686f > > > > > > > > > > Am Dienstag, den 17.11.2020, 22:42 +0000 schrieb Jonathan > > > > > Gallimore: > > > > > > > > > > I'll keep working on this. I got a clean build on my machine > > > > > here > > > > > (which > > > > > > > > > > takes just under 2 hours), and have gotten a release up for > > > > > vote. > > > > > We're > > > > > > > > > > definitely seeing 'odd' things on this instance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:32 PM David Blevins < > > > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2020, at 1:50 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < > > > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I kicked off a run of this last night: > > > > > > > > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master/10/ > > > > > > > > > > - which completed > > > > > > > > > > (it > > > > > > > > > > was hanging before), with 38 test failures, looking to be OWB > > > > > related. > > > > > > > > > > The > > > > > > > > > > tests I've looked at so far locally pass ok - I'm wondering > > > > > if > > > > > this is > > > > > > > > > > specific to Jenkins, or timing related (as the build went > > > > > past > > > > > midnight, > > > > > > > > > > and so old snapshots may be picked up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kicked off another full build on Jenkins, and also a full > > > > > build > > > > > locally > > > > > > > > > > (which take about half the time of the CI). I'll report back. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried some time ago to set us up in the Apache setup for > > > > > Jenkins and got > > > > > > > > > > failures along with a very not intuitive reactor order. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, in module order from this build: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master/10/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is not a complete summary, but a highlight the most odd > > > > > ordering I > > > > > > > > > > see: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unstable TomEE :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests :: > > > > > Web > > > > > Profile > > > > > > > > > > 29 min > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > Success TomEE :: TomEE :: Apache TomEE 1 min 53 sec > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > Success TomEE :: Assembly 3.6 sec > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > Success TomEE :: Container :: Core > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The above is the opposite of what I'd expect, which is: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Build the core code (TomEE :: Container :: Core) > > > > > > > > > > - Assemble the webapps (TomEE :: Assembly) > > > > > > > > > > - Create the Apache TomEE distribution zips (TomEE :: TomEE > > > > > :: > > > > > Apache > > > > > > > > > > TomEE) > > > > > > > > > > - Integration test the zips (TomEE :: Arquillian Adaptors > > > > > Parent > > > > > :: Tests > > > > > > > > > > :: Web Profile) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead we have: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Test the zips we haven't built yet > > > > > > > > > > - Build the zips from webapps we haven't created yet > > > > > > > > > > - Build the webapps from code we haven't compiled yet > > > > > > > > > > - Now compile the code > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's completely baffling. We get the correct order on our > > > > > machines and in > > > > > > > > > > buildbot. It's just this Jenkins that seems to create such a > > > > > completely > > > > > > > > > > unintelligible result. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like there is some invisible setting or "optimization" > > > > > enabled. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. > > > > > Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences > > > > > Max-Planck-Str. 39 > > > > > D-74081 Heilbronn > > > > > phone: +49 7131 504 6791 > > > > > mail: [email protected] > > > > > web: http://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/ > > > > > -- Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences Max-Planck-Str. 39 D-74081 Heilbronn phone: +49 7131 504 6791 mail: [email protected] web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
